I'm still shocked his gone!calotte12 wrote:I think MJ win in the none-age category. Impossible to guess his age.
I agree. They all look great and not their age at all. They look at least 35. But at times they can all look 40+ but those times are very rare.Charmbracelet wrote:I don't know what was happening in 1969/1970, but
Mariah
JLo
Jennifer Aniston
Mary J. Blige
all look amazing for early 40s!

Oh please , really, how can you compare a 38 yo woman to a 52 yo one?That's not a fair comparison, Madge is indeed almost 15 years older than Celine!!04wayne wrote:Aww poor Celine!Oh well, she looks better than Hagdonna, so I'm not too shattered
denise wrote:Oh please , really, how can you compare a 38 yo woman to a 52 yo one?That's not a fair comparison, Madge is indeed almost 15 years older than Celine!!04wayne wrote:Aww poor Celine!Oh well, she looks better than Hagdonna, so I'm not too shattered
Let's make a comparison when Madge was 38, in the Ray Of Light era, she was a flower at the top of her beauty, whereas Celine (at the same age) looks like a old , tired granny, I even do not want to imagine this woman at 52 y o.....the thought scares me
It had nothing to do with being sexual in her music or performance, actually!!!Charmbracelet wrote:She is definitely one of those that has aged in reverse (like Kelly Rowland). Just because she isn't seen as sexual in her music or her performances is no reason to call her "an old granny".