Moderators: biscuits, seattleboy, crazyman324
Yeah but if she wasnt with drugs in her system the outcome would have been different. Bottom of line she was still a cocaine user/addicted.MonaBlissa wrote:Let's get off the cocaine, because she according to the reports she had Metabolites, Marijuana, Alprazolam (Xanax), Cyclobenzaprine (Flexeril) and Diphenhydramine (Benadryl).
Don't jump on cocaine, if you can't get on big pharmaceuticals. And they're calling it an accidental drowning. People had died from that after taking muscle relaxers, which she had in her system.
Her cause death was an accidental drowning, no matter what was in her system!
I'm not denying what cocaine can do to your system, but I won't let Big Pharma off the hook. Benadryl makes you sleepy! Benadryl alone with heart disease could have taken her out with that accident---and she had a muscle relaxer and anti-depressant too. Don't just make cocaine, the big bad player, when other things were too. Big Pharma prescription drugs is the #1 drug addiction in the U.S., not cocaine.YesMC wrote:Yeah but if she wasnt with drugs in her system the outcome would have been different. Bottom of line she was still a cocaine user/addicted.
I had hope she was cleaned... Anyway i doesnt matter now.
Titan3510 wrote:Lorenzo why would you name the topic "Whitney's cause of death, Accidental Drowning & Cocaine" when the article clearly states that her cause of death was accidental drowning.
The article is titled "Whitney Houston Died From Accidental Drowning."
Thank you!Titan3510 wrote:And plus, if there is anything you need know about cocaine, it's that it won't put you to sleep.
Yes it is. Sadly, millions of middle aged Americans have this same amount of prescription drugs in their body from diabetes, heart disease, hypertension and pain....and it's nothing.biscuits wrote:How unfortunate that she had this party of drugs in her.
CrybabyTitan3510 wrote:Lorenzo why would you name the topic "Whitney's cause of death, Accidental Drowning & Cocaine" when the article clearly states that her cause of death was accidental drowning.
The article is titled "Whitney Houston Died From Accidental Drowning."
![]()
So...why did you do that?
And plus, if there is anything you need know about cocaine, it's that it won't put you to sleep.
It'll give you a heart attack. But it won't put you in a stupor....
Ain't nobody crying....Lorenzo wrote:CrybabyTitan3510 wrote:Lorenzo why would you name the topic "Whitney's cause of death, Accidental Drowning & Cocaine" when the article clearly states that her cause of death was accidental drowning.
The article is titled "Whitney Houston Died From Accidental Drowning."
![]()
So...why did you do that?
And plus, if there is anything you need know about cocaine, it's that it won't put you to sleep.
It'll give you a heart attack. But it won't put you in a stupor....People magazine changed the headline & story. So
Sensationalistic journalism and lying are--more or less--one and the same.biscuits wrote:Mentioning cocaine in the thread title makes it more interesting, even if it isn't entirely true. Headlines do it all the time.
People magazine on twitter:Titan3510 wrote:Ain't nobody crying....Lorenzo wrote:CrybabyTitan3510 wrote:Lorenzo why would you name the topic "Whitney's cause of death, Accidental Drowning & Cocaine" when the article clearly states that her cause of death was accidental drowning.
The article is titled "Whitney Houston Died From Accidental Drowning."
![]()
So...why did you do that?
And plus, if there is anything you need know about cocaine, it's that it won't put you to sleep.
It'll give you a heart attack. But it won't put you in a stupor....People magazine changed the headline & story. So
I'm just speaking the truth.
I can see them changing the headline though...People probably changed the headline because they were INCORRECT and probably could've gotten sued.
But about changing the story.
Why would they change an entire story? How could they change an entire story when it's already been published and released...?
She wasn't (is not) the only one, biscuits...biscuits wrote:What is there to be suspicious about? She was a drug addict.
I don't get what you're trying to say (especially in your previous post).Titan3510 wrote:She wasn't (is not) the only one, biscuits...biscuits wrote:What is there to be suspicious about? She was a drug addict.
One too many have passed. And one too many things have been revealed to us and exposed...
There's something really wrong about the entertainment industry.