Thatttttttt's Titan!Yoshimo wrote:
Word. Nice one Titan for bringing the debate for equal rights back about 30 years.![]()
:
Moderators: king_oxymoron, Spartan, cristy
Thatttttttt's Titan!Yoshimo wrote:
Word. Nice one Titan for bringing the debate for equal rights back about 30 years.![]()
:
That's probably a popular opinion if someone was planning on raising their kids listening to Celine Dion.Yoshimo wrote:Christ almighty, someone put Childline on speed-dial.04wayne wrote:AND I will raise them the right way - as a fan of Celine Dion.![]()
Hmmm. I think the keywords in that are "stable, loving household" that have the advantage - regardless of what role the person plays (mother, father, aunt, grandfather etc) over children who don't.Titan3510 wrote:Everyone knows that children who grow up in a stable, loving household with a mother and a father have a distinct advantage over children who don't.
Everyone knows that. So why even try to gloss over that...
Well...gender is important.sambo9 wrote:And your post was very anti-gay adoption; you were talking about the importance of gender, and the fact that children are "hurting" because they haven't got a parent of a certain sex around.
But it is the truth, Sambo.And as usual, your comment was full of dismissive, point-blank statements that gave no room for other people to have an opinion, e.g. "I'm sorry but that's the truth", "You are mistaken", which fuels people to respond to you with a more aggressive tone.
But I really wish people would stop letting their personal feelings prevent them from thinking about what I'm saying
Thanks for providing this logic biscuits.biscuits wrote:I'm not against gay adoption, but I still have some questions about it.
Like, how does a child feel having to tell their classmates they have 2 dads and no mom? It can't be easy I'm sure.
This.neoepzilon wrote:It's logical to approach a situation considering the pros and the cons and understanding that it may not be a proper solution to a problem.
I understand where you're coming from but you really shouldn't compare race and sexual orientation like that.sambo9 wrote:It's not really logic, is it? It's dodging a problem (bullying at school) instead of solving it. Would it have been "logical" in the 50s to prevent a black father and a white mother from having children because the child might be teased in the playground?
Titan3510 wrote:Gender does matter.RightToDream wrote:Strongly disagree with this.Titan3510 wrote:Gender does matter when it comes to raising a child. And children need a mother and a father.GRM wrote:2. Gay parents make just a job as straight parents, gender doesn't matter in raising a child
I'm not judging; I'm just saying.
Boys and girls are different and should be raised differently.
A man cannot teach a girl to be a woman and a woman cannot teach a boy to be a man. It's just not feasible to be both the man of the hosue and a mother at the same time.
I'm sorry but it's the truth.
If you guys really think that growing up without a mother or a father doesn't affect the majority of children, then you are sadly mistaken...
This is just not true. I was brought up by my mother, my mother alone, and I'm 100% sure I'm no less a man than any other. The whole 'teach a boy to be man' nonsense is a backwards view to start with.Titan3510 wrote:Everyone knows that children who grow up in a stable, loving household with a mother and a father have a distinct advantage over children who don't.
Everyone knows that. So why even try to gloss over that...
...and more humbleRightToDream wrote:I spent my entire time at school smarter, more mature and well-mannered than all of the children with married parents.
You're taking offense to things that I haven't even said, dude...RightToDream wrote:This is just not true. I was brought up by my mother, my mother alone, and I'm 100% sure I'm no less a man than any other.
So please excuse me for being slightly offended by what you have said.
Call it what you will but there is a method to the madness.The whole 'teach a boy to be man' nonsense is a backwards view to start with.
Once again, you're addressing a distortion of my argument, rather than addressing my actual argument.Referring to your point about children with a mother and father having an advantage over those who don't
All?I spent my entire time at school smarter, more mature and well-mannered than all of the children with married parents.
marcsi wrote:...and more humbleRightToDream wrote:I spent my entire time at school smarter, more mature and well-mannered than all of the children with married parents.![]()
![]()
j/k, I remember when I first saw a photo of u I was quite surprised those thoughtful and mature posts come from such a young person
Can't say I disagree with this (especially for boys who don't have fathersneoepzilon wrote:It's not about incomes and being able to provide for a child. It's so much deeper than that. We can get into a conversation about duality and the necessity of masculine and feminine in the Universe but your body isn't ready.
I do believe that two parents are better than one, but a good mother and a good father is certainly optimal compared to a good father and a good father.
I agree.Titan3510 wrote:Gender does matter when it comes to raising a child. And children need a mother and a father.