Moderator: Amir
I'm with you here!crazycrazy wrote:It's a good idea but I'm so used to UKMIX being outdated and minimal, it's part of the charm.![]()
crazycrazy wrote:It's a good idea but I'm so used to UKMIX being outdated and minimal, it's part of the charm.![]()
Yes! I agree completely! ":)" always comes off as shady and ":D" is just too much sometimes.sambo9 wrote:We need a smiley face that's not so eerily vacant () but at the same time, not so sarcastic and intense (
).
JSparksFan wrote:Yes! I agree completely! ":)" always comes off as shady and ":D" is just too much sometimes.sambo9 wrote:We need a smiley face that's not so eerily vacant () but at the same time, not so sarcastic and intense (
).
ANH wrote:Meh. The current emoticons do the job. But you can always add them up to create new meanings.![]()
= indigestion
![]()
![]()
= sick
![]()
![]()
= infatuation
![]()
![]()
![]()
= infatuation with permission to proceed to third base (genital pic swap as per the Geneva convention for distances up to 100M/200KM; flaccid only)
+1JSparksFan wrote:Yes! I agree completely! ":)" always comes off as shady and ":D" is just too much sometimes.sambo9 wrote:We need a smiley face that's not so eerily vacant () but at the same time, not so sarcastic and intense (
).