How about more emoticons?

by **Merci** » Thu May 17, 2012 5:40 pm

LOOOL yes I agree about this ':D' I thought I was the only one, but I don't like to use it tbh!

We need:
- an excited smiley, similar to this

- Kanye's Shrug

also, a smh, a facepalm, etc..

and this wouldn't hurt

by **theArmy** » Thu May 17, 2012 8:08 pm

^ that would be too ATRL diva like

by **Merci** » Thu May 17, 2012 9:01 pm

theArmy wrote:^ that would be too ATRL diva like

I don't know her [/Mariah]

I found them in a blu-rays forum

theArmy wrote::)

shady

by **Serby** » Thu May 17, 2012 10:24 pm

is beyond awful. It looks so evil :lol:

Website · by **Shorty** » Thu May 17, 2012 11:58 pm

LOL I'm the only person who doesn't mind Mr

I think it's so cute!

And I don't want like a million new emoticons, it would remind me too much of ATRL. Maybe a couple of new ones, but not like 193859349568.

by **summer** » Fri May 18, 2012 4:50 am

Basil4 wrote:
JSparksFan wrote:
sambo9 wrote:We need a smiley face that's not so eerily vacant ( ) but at the same time, not so sarcastic and intense ( ).
Yes! I agree completely! ":)" always comes off as shady and ":D" is just too much sometimes.
+1

+2

by **Merci** » Fri May 18, 2012 11:33 am

Shorty wrote:And I don't want like a million new emoticons, it would remind me too much of ATRL. Maybe a couple of new ones, but not like 193859349568.

oh yes, mods make sure it's just the right amount for shorty! we don't need to bother her!

by **sambo9** » Fri May 18, 2012 3:06 pm

ECE wrote:
JSparksFan wrote:
sambo9 wrote:We need a smiley face that's not so eerily vacant ( ) but at the same time, not so sarcastic and intense ( ).
Yes! I agree completely! ":)" always comes off as shady and ":D" is just too much sometimes.
is fake AF.

LOL Yes!

"Oh, that's nice!

" = Couldn't care less.
"Oh, that's nice!

" = Creepy and over-enthusiastic.

by **steophonic** » Fri May 18, 2012 3:36 pm

sambo9 wrote:"Oh, that's nice! " = Creepy and over-enthusiastic.

LOL "Creepy"

I think more emoticons would be good. If that ever happened I think we should get rid of the :roll:

emoticon at the same time.

by **theArmy** » Fri May 18, 2012 10:26 pm

Merci wrote:
theArmy wrote:^ that would be too ATRL diva like
I don't know her [/Mariah]

I found them in a blu-rays forum

theArmy wrote::)
shady

!

Website · by **Shorty** » Fri May 18, 2012 11:37 pm

Merci wrote:
Shorty wrote:And I don't want like a million new emoticons, it would remind me too much of ATRL. Maybe a couple of new ones, but not like 193859349568.
oh yes, mods make sure it's just the right amount for shorty! we don't need to bother her!

? What's with the attitude? I was just stating my opinion like everybody else...

And why do I not see the

smiley being creepy whatsoever? Oh god, I hope people don't think my posts are creepy, I use a whole load of them

Gotta agree about

though, it does make you look like you don't really care. It doesn't even really look like a happy smiley.

by **Virgostar** » Sat May 19, 2012 12:25 am

steophonic wrote:
I think more emoticons would be good. If that ever happened I think we should get rid of the emoticon at the same time.

I think the :roll:

emoticon still serves a purpose, however, there would be/are better emoticons to use. Just need a bit more variety, that's all.

by **samra** » Sat May 26, 2012 4:21 pm

I love the eyeroll emoticon. I also agree with the sentiments about this:

emoticon. I don't think I've ever used it.

I think we should get 6 more to make it 20.

by **urbanmusik** » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:58 pm

Can we have this legendary emoticon and call it :greeneyedsoul:?

by **HBIC** » Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:04 pm

]

yes

by **Merci** » Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:21 pm

urbanmusik wrote:Can we have this legendary emoticon and call it :greeneyedsoul:?

by **CrazyCrazy** » Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:22 pm

by **urbanmusik** » Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:27 pm

Merci wrote:
urbanmusik wrote:Can we have this legendary emoticon and call it :greeneyedsoul:?

by **CrazyCrazy** » Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:30 pm

And these ones too:

by **Chun** » Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:28 am

They are all horrible.

by **Baditude** » Sun Dec 23, 2012 1:51 am

I really want use all of those! :lol:

by **ThaInfo1** » Sun Dec 23, 2012 7:59 am

Baditude wrote:I really want use all of those!

by **CrazyCrazy** » Sun Dec 23, 2012 6:16 pm

chun1702 wrote:They are all horrible.

Why? They are expressive and cute.

by **Chun** » Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:09 pm

crazycrazy wrote:
chun1702 wrote:They are all horrible.
Why? They are expressive and cute.

Maybe because I can't read the meaning of some of those. And they are not in the same style, don't fit the UKmix emoticon style.

by **ECE** » Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:16 am