Moderators: Amir, kingofskiffle, arab, AutomaticBR, seattleboy
All of what you said is true. Even though Britney of course started out as a 16 year old pop star, she marketed herself as a sex symbol that grown up men felt like perverts for wanting to get with and tried to establish herself more as a teen Madonna/Janet than as a Disney star.GetBack wrote:Miley became annoying when she grew up, with all the drama of her shedding off her innocence and all and of course, her supposed feud with her dad. She tried to hard to be sexy, unlike Britney, Christina, Lindsay Lohan, who were all in the magazines when they became full-fledged sex kittens. She doesn't have a strong sex appeal, it looked really forced on her.
As for Britney, she was courting controversy since the first day of her existence: she teased in "...Baby One More Time" video and Rolling Stone cover, stripped in "Oops!...I Did It Again" performance, flaunted in the "Don't Let Me Be the last to Know" and "Slave 4 U" videos and bared her flesh in "Toxic" up to present.
With Justin Bieber, it's still very awkward because (1) he still looks like a kid, and (2) his stigma as an artist is the "kid-friendly singer who is very conservative, decent and proper" which is hard to erase with his attitude of being always polite and nice, and hugging young girls and being a role model to kids. He is no Justin Timberlake (back in 2000-2002) whose image was a bit of a "playboy and hopeless romantic crooner" or Usher (back in 1997-1999) who had the image that can entice a mature audience with the sexual innuendo of his music despite his age at that time.
No. He looks like a little lesbian girl.Timmy94 wrote:So can't he turn into a sexy guy just because he looks like a kid? I mean there must be a way if he really wants to escape from the "little sweet teen idol"...
Same here. I have rethought my opinions about guys I thought were too young/emo at one point (Zac Efron and Joe Jonas) but yet I still don't find anything sexy about The Biebs yet.stevyy wrote:i can't get his previous haircut out of my memory. He remains unsexy in my world.02.
400k for his new album is a mighty huge projection.
I used to hate Jonas Brothers too then Joe grew up and changed his look into a more masculine and adult image and now I think he's sexy, I thought Justin Timberlake was hideous when N'Sync came out then he made himself over and I thought he was gorgeous. So please, don't go there.serbia95riri wrote:Sorry, but your oppinion on this one doesn't count. You're one of the biggest haters of Bieber I knowNothingFails wrote:Yes, it is hard to be a sex symbol when you look prepubescent......![]()
p.s. I'm not even defending him
I agree! I mean, Justin Bieber sadly didn't pull it off as well as the other squeaky-clean boys who grew up. It's just way too early for him, and thus we got a moderate to relatively-weak reception to his supposed maturity, and let's not get started with the annoying facial expressions he does these days like in the single cover of "Boyfriend"...NothingFails wrote:I used to hate Jonas Brothers too then Joe grew up and changed his look into a more masculine and adult image and now I think he's sexy, I thought Justin Timberlake was hideous when N'Sync came out then he made himself over and I thought he was gorgeous. So please, don't go there.serbia95riri wrote:Sorry, but your oppinion on this one doesn't count. You're one of the biggest haters of Bieber I knowNothingFails wrote:Yes, it is hard to be a sex symbol when you look prepubescent......![]()
p.s. I'm not even defending him
So seriously, spare me the "you just hate Bieber" thing. If Bieber makes himself over to something more masculine and mature and looks good, I'll be the first to admit he's attractive.

HDD wrote:Maroon 5 and Linkin Park have something in common. The two bands have big-money/high-pressure albums hitting next Tuesday (6/26), and the latest projections have both at around 200k—meaning they’ll likely be in a battle for #1 not just with each other but also with Justin Bieber’s Believe, which will then be in its second week.
That's good for Linkin Park... Maroon 5 was clear to sell around that number because Moves Like Jagger hugely pushed their population and they also have a successful lead single. Compared to this, Linkin Park have been dropping from album to album since Meteora so I thought they could only sell 150k at best... I'm curious what they make out of this!starshine90 wrote:HDD wrote:Maroon 5 and Linkin Park have something in common. The two bands have big-money/high-pressure albums hitting next Tuesday (6/26), and the latest projections have both at around 200k—meaning they’ll likely be in a battle for #1 not just with each other but also with Justin Bieber’s Believe, which will then be in its second week.
My expectations for Justin.Timmy94 wrote:That's good for Linkin Park... Maroon 5 was clear to sell around that number because Moves Like Jagger hugely pushed their population and they also have a successful lead single. Compared to this, Linkin Park have been dropping from album to album since Meteora so I thought they could only sell 150k at best... I'm curious what they make out of this!starshine90 wrote:HDD wrote:Maroon 5 and Linkin Park have something in common. The two bands have big-money/high-pressure albums hitting next Tuesday (6/26), and the latest projections have both at around 200k—meaning they’ll likely be in a battle for #1 not just with each other but also with Justin Bieber’s Believe, which will then be in its second week.
And if Justin Bieber is going to sell around 200k, his 2nd week drop could be relatively mild, which is neat. The last album to sell 200k+ in its second week was Lil Wayne's Tha Carter IV in September 2011 (that is already 9 months ago).
Haven't they always been a soccer mom band?Maroon 5 have become a soccer mom band and that's turned off a lot of those who bought Songs About Jane