Moderators: biscuits, cristy, UKMusicLova, Benjamin
YES lol me tooakram3500 wrote:Thank God I saved it to my computerMAM wrote:I also like how this song is serious and not camp.
Also it has been taken down.![]()
![]()
YOUTUBE LINK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wXoMsmUKb4hotMCfan wrote:can you send me a copy, babe? xxakram3500 wrote:Thank God I saved it to my computerMAM wrote:I also like how this song is serious and not camp.
Also it has been taken down.![]()
![]()
I don't think the tempo would change in the middle of a trackIcanthearyou wrote:Tempos can certainly change on a track. Not to mention, with all of that carrying on in the back, it was hard to make out much of anything, imo.
it seems like "Can't Nobody"MAM wrote:Questions: 1) Around the ten second mark Mariah sings a word and repeats it a few times quite fast- what is she singing? Is it the word "triumphant"?
2) What is Mariah about to sing at the end? My guess - "There's someone"
Just out of curiousity, how do you know that was the middle of the track?akram3500 wrote:I don't think the tempo would change in the middle of a trackIcanthearyou wrote:Tempos can certainly change on a track. Not to mention, with all of that carrying on in the back, it was hard to make out much of anything, imo.and no need for HQ to figure out the tempo.
are you serious? not here for Auld Lang Sine Part 2!Icanthearyou wrote:Just out of curiousity, how do you know that was the middle of the track?akram3500 wrote:I don't think the tempo would change in the middle of a trackIcanthearyou wrote:Tempos can certainly change on a track. Not to mention, with all of that carrying on in the back, it was hard to make out much of anything, imo.and no need for HQ to figure out the tempo.
. Also, there is no guideline as to when the tempo of a track can change. That's up to the producer. See Bangledesh & Swizz Beatz, who are maestros at that.
Really? This song sounds much slower, but maybe the pace of the song changes after the Rick Ross' verse.akram3500 wrote:Side Effects is slower actually... but this is slower than Obsessed...Baditude wrote:So this is like a slower version of Side Effects. Interesting.
No it's faster than SideEffects.. Spot number of seconds betwwen the drum kick and the snare, and do the same for Side Effects, you'll find out Side Effects is much slower actually, although Side Effects sounds faster because of the fast singing.Baditude wrote:Really? This song sounds much slower, but maybe the pace of the song changes after the Rick Ross' verse.akram3500 wrote:Side Effects is slower actually... but this is slower than Obsessed...Baditude wrote:So this is like a slower version of Side Effects. Interesting.
Thanks babe. Can't really judge since it's 80% noise.MAM wrote:YOUTUBE LINK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wXoMsmUKb4hotMCfan wrote:can you send me a copy, babe? xxakram3500 wrote:Thank God I saved it to my computerMAM wrote:I also like how this song is serious and not camp.
Also it has been taken down.![]()
![]()
Not necessarily, it depends if they want the slow motion effect.. generally in a rap verse they don't do it, it would sound really weirdhotMCfan wrote:Was this gotten from the music video shoot? Isn't it when they shoot music videos the song is played twice faster?