Nice!poriel wrote:1. KATY PERRY - Wide Awake: 163.211 (+ 0.972) ?
2. MAROON 5 - Payphone f/Wiz Khalifa: 161.278 (- 2.587) ?
3. ELLIE GOULDING - Lights: 156.112 (+ 1.470)
5. CARLY RAE JEPSEN - Call Me Maybe: 135.497 (- 3.197)
Moderators: kingofskiffle, seattleboy, arab, AutomaticBR
Nice!poriel wrote:1. KATY PERRY - Wide Awake: 163.211 (+ 0.972) ?
2. MAROON 5 - Payphone f/Wiz Khalifa: 161.278 (- 2.587) ?
3. ELLIE GOULDING - Lights: 156.112 (+ 1.470)
5. CARLY RAE JEPSEN - Call Me Maybe: 135.497 (- 3.197)
I tryed (hard!) to figure it out and here's the only solution which I can come with. I'll try to explain my mathematical thoughts as clear as possible but english is not my mothertongue, so ask if you don't get itTimmy94 wrote:Airplay seems to count the most. I take your example of WHYB: It was No. 2 on airplay (the one Billboard uses), No. 20 on digital and No. 21 on on demand last week.MusicRecords wrote:Yeah but the percentages are different for each, Billboard says its sales>AirPlay>streaming...but makes no senseGagich wrote:Well, both streaming and airplay together are stronger than sales only, aren't they?![]()
WHYB remained at the same position (#7) this week and it was around #30 all week on iTunes
It could reach No. 7 percentwise in the end if airplay would count for 75% or more...
My only solution would be that Where Have You Been could've profitted from the fact that it did overall well while other songs maybe were good on either airplay, on demand or digital but not the other 2...
Wide Awake? Its current peak is #3.madboy wrote:please,
peak of katy in airplay uk!!!
thank u
Wow. It has been doing so good thereTimmy94 wrote:Canadian Albums Chart:
11 (13) Teenage Dream 102 weeks (No. 1 for 1 week)
Almost made the top 10![]()
...
Canadian Hot 100:
1 (2) Wide Awake 12 weeks (No. 1 for 2 weeks)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
50 (38) Part Of Me 25 weeks (No. 1 for 1 week)
I gave up on themstarshine90 wrote:Billboard no longer provides us the Radio and On-Demand info?!
Do they want to cheat on us?!
![]()
I never said it would reach #1 lol, if you check back on old pages you'll see that I said that "I wanted WA to be top 3 so bad"Rihab95 wrote:So where is your soon-to-be No.1 now, MusicRecords? And I was so sure both of them would reach the top, but neither one of them did in the end..![]()
![]()
Anyway, wasn't this era supposed to be over a few weeks ago or so?
Next one please..
Me too.MusicRecords wrote:I never said it would reach #1 lol, if you check back on old pages you'll see that I said that "I wanted WA to be top 3 so bad"Rihab95 wrote:So where is your soon-to-be No.1 now, MusicRecords? And I was so sure both of them would reach the top, but neither one of them did in the end..![]()
![]()
Anyway, wasn't this era supposed to be over a few weeks ago or so?
Next one please.....meanwhile WHYB wasn't even that
![]()
Well I guess the era is now over, we just need WA to fall...I want the next album so bad!
She could pull ~300k in Holiday season at best (with 1-2 smashes). Her sales are not frontloaded.BlackStar wrote:^ Don't you think 400k is too much?
That's definitely true, ... as far as people know about it. I mean : we spend a lot of time examining charts and searching articles about music industry, so it's clear to us, but does the general public know that all the singles from Katy in the 2 previous years come from the same album?Rihab95 wrote:I mean on the one hand I'm sure that with a November release she wouldn't lose too much momentum and could open with 400k+ because people now know her whole album is worth buying and not only the lead and second single...
Yah some of my friends think she has released so many albums or something. Whenever there's a new single they're like "Oh have you heard Katy Perry's new song, it came out not long ago" but it had been released when the album came out, the single just didn't become popular until it got the music video and everythingtaylorfan wrote:That's definitely true, ... as far as people know about it. I mean : we spend a lot of time examining charts and searching articles about music industry, so it's clear to us, but does the general public know that all the singles from Katy in the 2 previous years come from the same album?Rihab95 wrote:I mean on the one hand I'm sure that with a November release she wouldn't lose too much momentum and could open with 400k+ because people now know her whole album is worth buying and not only the lead and second single...
Just asking, 'cause when I speak about music with friends, they just have no idea which single was the lead single, and which album it comes from, etc...
The only "formula" the Hot 100 uses is this:taylorfan wrote:I tryed (hard!) to figure it out and here's the only solution which I can come with. I'll try to explain my mathematical thoughts as clear as possible but english is not my mothertongue, so ask if you don't get itTimmy94 wrote:Airplay seems to count the most. I take your example of WHYB: It was No. 2 on airplay (the one Billboard uses), No. 20 on digital and No. 21 on on demand last week.MusicRecords wrote:Yeah but the percentages are different for each, Billboard says its sales>AirPlay>streaming...but makes no senseGagich wrote:Well, both streaming and airplay together are stronger than sales only, aren't they?![]()
WHYB remained at the same position (#7) this week and it was around #30 all week on iTunes
It could reach No. 7 percentwise in the end if airplay would count for 75% or more...
My only solution would be that Where Have You Been could've profitted from the fact that it did overall well while other songs maybe were good on either airplay, on demand or digital but not the other 2...![]()
Eventually, what is important is not the weight of sales/radio/streaming but the deviation (differential, difference) of points for each part (sales/radio/streaming) between two songs that aim in the same range on spots for Hot 100. That's why I think that:
The formula used to calculate Hot 100 points for sales is a linear form.
The formula used to calculate Hot 100 points for airplay is a quadratic or exponential form
Can't really tell for streaming activity, don't have enough situations where it was important.
EXAMPLE:
Song 1, WHYB type : Strong for airplay, weak on sales and streaming
Song 2, Titanium type : Not strong for airplay (about half of Song 1), stronger on both sales and streaming.
Song 1 get (random figures):
45 points for Sales
35 points for airplay
10 points for streaming
Song 2 gets:
55 points for Sales (it may be a lot stronger than song 1, as the formula is linear, the difference of points is not huge)
15 points for airplay (as the formula is exponential, even small difference on audience impression make huge difference on points, so fancy what it is for big audience impression differences)
15 points for streaming (once again, I can't really come with an exact answer for streaming)
Song 1 (90 points) charts higher than Song 2 (85 points). With those formulas, Billboard is theoretically right saying that sales count more than airplay (speaking in terms of points) but in the reality, a difference in airplay between two songs counts a lot lot lot more than a difference in sales (because of the characteristic of the exponential/linear forms)
Convinced?