I agree too!stevyy wrote:jpguy, i think you are the president of the christina fans on ukmix.
And I'm actually surpised to see that jpguy likes Mariah as much as he does. I always thought he hated her!
A stan for each #1 song!PosziMC2 wrote:Brilliant Top 2! I cant at Mariah scoring 18 #1s. Gurl please![]()
![]()
I loooove Beyonce... And her fans too <3.
Thank you Wayne for doing this countdown
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!mimifan09 wrote:I agree too!stevyy wrote:jpguy, i think you are the president of the christina fans on ukmix.
And I'm actually surpised to see that jpguy likes Mariah as much as he does. I always thought he hated her!
That's what I'm aiming for!stevyy wrote:jpguy, i think you are the president of the christina fans on ukmix.
No it doesn't, but it will as I want to do the next oneserbia95riri wrote: understand that it's hugeeeee job
But I doesn't have to be done by wayne
Excatly my thoughtJSparksFan wrote:A stan for each #1 song!PosziMC2 wrote:Brilliant Top 2! I cant at Mariah scoring 18 #1s. Gurl please![]()
![]()
I loooove Beyonce... And her fans too <3.
Thank you Wayne for doing this countdown
I'm bitchy, but I want next year countdown04wayne wrote:No it doesn't, but it will as I want to do the next oneserbia95riri wrote: understand that it's hugeeeee job
But I doesn't have to be done by wayne
And its December 2013, ready to run in 2014 - there will be no 2012/2013 countdown.
True...crazycrazy wrote:The top end of the chart will just have the same artists, so what's the point!?
This is just about who has the most stans!Titan3510 wrote:True...crazycrazy wrote:The top end of the chart will just have the same artists, so what's the point!?
I agree. Hence it definitely not needing to be an annual countdown.crazycrazy wrote:I'd love a countdown next year but the top end of the chart will just have the same artists, so what's the point!?
Of course not. 2 albums could cement an artist credebility and be enough to leave a legacy. Check Amy Winehouse or Lauryn Hill. Adele is a great singer, very talented...Formusic wrote:For someone who put Adele at #1 with only 2 albums out, your post is just stupidLioha wrote:Britney at #8?
It's an extremely high position for a person who's the one of the worst trend-setters in the music history. Her guilt is all that we can see now in the contemporary music - shallow voiceless so-called divas in the tacky outfits lip-syncing manufactured trash-dance-pop.
She deserves to be executed
Aaah, thanks for giving me the courage to quote this truth.Formusic wrote:AlexZ was one of the most honest members, he s not a hypocrite, when he didn t like this or that, he s not afraid to show it even if it s really unpopular !
Cheers.Lioha wrote:Britney at #8?
It's an extremely high position for a person who's the one of the worst trend-setters in the music history. Her guilt is all that we can see now in the contemporary music - shallow voiceless so-called divas in the tacky outfits lip-syncing manufactured trash-dance-pop.
Regardless of how much happens, most peoples tastes do not change significantly over such a short period of time.Lemo wrote:A lot can happen in music in 2 years. It's probably a good idea we don't have a countdown every year
so what s the idea ? Adele has already left legacy with 2 albums ?! if Lauryn Hill or Amy Winehouse was 3, i m sure people would say they are too high !!! many were shocked with Alicia, Pink, Rihanna and the others...haven t these acts already left "legacy" as well ?!!! though if it 's "normal" that Adele is 3, then why not Britney at #8, Alicia at 6 and Rihanna atc... ?! b/c you don t like her music, are you too "brainy" for her teen "crap" music ? and i m not saying that Adele ain t talented, 21 is a great album and so is 19 IMO but talking about an artist like he did with Britney is just stupid, plus the talent stuff is completly subjective, my point is that it s ridiculous to come up with arrogant words like those even though the one that you stan for ain t bigger either. If you don t like her music, fine but no need to say that Britney deserves to be executed.argentino78 wrote:Of course not. 2 albums could cement an artist credebility and be enough to leave a legacy. Check Amy Winehouse or Lauryn Hill. Adele is a great singer, very talented...Formusic wrote:For someone who put Adele at #1 with only 2 albums out, your post is just stupidLioha wrote:Britney at #8?
It's an extremely high position for a person who's the one of the worst trend-setters in the music history. Her guilt is all that we can see now in the contemporary music - shallow voiceless so-called divas in the tacky outfits lip-syncing manufactured trash-dance-pop.
She deserves to be executed
That would deserve a warning or ban IF only Britney had an account here!Formusic wrote:please don t only read between the lines ! ofc he s free of his choice, but does he need to say that Britney deserves to be executed ? it s against the rules if i m not mistaken and many members were warned/banned for less important things.
I think you are not the one who can guess what is stupid and what is not.Formusic wrote:For someone who put Adele at #1 with only 2 albums out, your post is just stupidLioha wrote:Britney at #8?
It's an extremely high position for a person who's the one of the worst trend-setters in the music history. Her guilt is all that we can see now in the contemporary music - shallow voiceless so-called divas in the tacky outfits lip-syncing manufactured trash-dance-pop.
She deserves to be executed
Oh c'mon, it was a sarcasmFormusic wrote:please don t only read between the lines ! ofc he s free of his choice, but does he need to say that Britney deserves to be executed ? it s against the rules if i m not mistaken and many members were warned/banned for less important things.