Moderator: Amir
No, i won't.Thriller wrote:Shush.
A specialist forum won't solve the issue of borderline acts.What is so difficult to understand here? So one single she did was a bit chillout/ deeper than the usual no-brain hands-in-the-air stuff she's suddenly not Dance anymore? That's her background, that's the place record stores and taste-makers will put her. Will Jessie Ware's album be eventually moved from Dance because it's too "deep" for that forum? Bad enough that she's already in two forums.
Plym wrote:Agree with this.Blondini wrote:Or create a Chillout/ Alternative Dance Forum.
Create a chillout section and stick Blondini in it for a few weeks.
WOAAAAAAAAAAAAHPlym wrote:Agree with this.Blondini wrote:Or create a Chillout/ Alternative Dance Forum.
Create a chillout section and stick Blondini in it for a few weeks.
Plym wrote:Agree with this.Blondini wrote:Or create a Chillout/ Alternative Dance Forum.
Create a chillout section and stick Blondini in it for a few weeks.
Plym wrote:Agree with this.Blondini wrote:Or create a Chillout/ Alternative Dance Forum.
Create a chillout section and stick Blondini in it for a few weeks.
Absolutely awful idea. Just because YOU don't post there, you think they are pointless. This obsession with genre definition is so annoying - can't we just enjoy the music without having to pigeonhole everything.Blondini wrote:Remove Sport and Artists and Promotion (who bothers to look in there??) - they're both dead (more so than Retro). Internet and Technology too - This n That can be used for most of these things.
LOLZPlym wrote:Agree with this.Blondini wrote:Or create a Chillout/ Alternative Dance Forum.
Create a chillout section and stick Blondini in it for a few weeks.
Agreed entirely with Ste.steophonic wrote:Absolutely awful idea. Just because YOU don't post there, you think they are pointless. This obsession with genre definition is so annoying - can't we just enjoy the music without having to pigeonhole everything.Blondini wrote:Remove Sport and Artists and Promotion (who bothers to look in there??) - they're both dead (more so than Retro). Internet and Technology too - This n That can be used for most of these things.
I can see some merit for things like Country music and Jazz but I'm not convinced that it would be a particularly thriving forum. Also it would still be lumping diverse genres like Country, Jazz and Classical together in one forum so I don't see how that's much different from the way things are now. An alternative dance forum is pointless in my view - should just go in dance or alternative.
You don't have Alternative - you have Rock/ Alternative. You don't technically have Dance in practice - you have Club Music. A lot of these dance-based alternative acts do not belong in a forum that is at root - Rock-based. There should be more distinction. You can call it After Hours Chill Out Forum if you have trouble with the double use of the word Alternative. Still gives you an idea of what goes in there. Why are lovers of commercial (theoretically, at least) club music with fast BPM's allowed their own exclusive forum but lovers of chillout/ downtempo/ more progressive dance music aren't? - they have to rub shoulders with fans of Evanescence, Coldplay and The Script *cough*. You don't take out all the slowjams from Urban or all the love ballads from Pop. So why remove downtempo from Dance?king_oxymoron wrote:WOAAAAAAAAAAAAHPlym wrote:Agree with this.Blondini wrote:Or create a Chillout/ Alternative Dance Forum.
Create a chillout section and stick Blondini in it for a few weeks.
As if you want us to lose Sport for an 'Alternative Dance' forum when we already have 'Dance' and 'Alternative'. NO TA
Thanks!04wayne wrote:OH vom. I voted yes in the poll by accident!!!
I seriously don't think the frontman of the biggest UK boyband of all time would look wonky in the pop forumBlondini wrote:Bjork and The Prodigy have a lot to answer for!![]()
![]()
![]()
PS. Gary Barlow's Sing is Classical/ World music. We need the New Forum cause that will look wonky in Pop!