Les Misérables [2012]

Moderators: crazyman324, Tiger

 

Postby Merci » Wed May 30, 2012 1:03 pm

Image

Hugh Jackman
Russell Crowe
Anne Hathaway
Amanda Seyfried
Sacha Baron Cohen
Helena Bonham Carter

Directed by: Tom Hooper

Release Date: 14 December 2012

Teaser featuring Anne Hathaway singing I Dreamed a Dream

so excited for this! I remember reading the novel when I was younger
User avatar
Merci
Legend
 
Posts: 14078
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006
Location: Kuwait

Postby johnny_d » Wed May 30, 2012 8:50 pm

My God that trailer is amazing!! I need it to be Christmas already. Really looking forward to this.
Remember us in AmenJena...

...If we could just go back to the start
User avatar
johnny_d
Manager
 
Posts: 1778
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009
Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland

Postby Noahh » Wed May 30, 2012 9:43 pm

So looking forward to this. The teaser-trailer looks amazing! :D
User avatar
Noahh
Legend
 
Posts: 11272
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010
Location: The Netherlands

Postby Spartan » Thu May 31, 2012 11:25 am

I'm so stoked for this. I hope they do it justice.
"if that's a veiled criticism about me, I won't hear it and I won't respond to it"
User avatar
Spartan
Legend
 
Posts: 20107
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009

Postby johnny_d » Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:27 pm

New trailer

I am so excited for this film to come out guys!!
Remember us in AmenJena...

...If we could just go back to the start
User avatar
johnny_d
Manager
 
Posts: 1778
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009
Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland

Postby thebigham » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:57 am

I saw this tonight.

Les Miz is not my favorite musical. I find it long and boring.

The movie was long and boring, BUT the live singing made for some AMAZING performances.

Give the Oscar to Hugh Jackman and Anne Hathaway right now!

Eddie Redmayne should be nominated for best supporting actor.

Very impressed with Russell Crowe and Samantha Barks.

Amanda Seyfried has a very small role. She was okay.

I hate Master of the House so I did not enjoy Sascha Baron Cohen nor Helena Bonham Carter.

The little boy who help the Revolution was excellent.

I did cry.
User avatar
thebigham
Legend
 
Posts: 16627
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005
Location: New York City

Postby Baditude » Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:20 am

^I heard Russell Crowe was an awful singer in this movie. What did you think of his performance (singing)?
I'm gonna do you like drugs tonight...
User avatar
Baditude
Superstar
 
Posts: 5697
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008
Location: New York City + the mosh pits

Postby thebigham » Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:08 pm

^I thought he was very good. He should be out promoting this movie.
User avatar
thebigham
Legend
 
Posts: 16627
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005
Location: New York City

Postby GetBack » Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:43 pm

I can't wait to see this! :D :D
User avatar
GetBack
Legend
 
Posts: 14327
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010
Location: Philippines

Postby steophonic » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:35 pm

I'm so excited to see this. The trailer gave me goosebumps!
User avatar
steophonic
Music Junkie
 
Posts: 21514
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004

Postby Tripolis » Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:11 am

Saw this yesterday, it was brilliant IMO.

Anne Hathaway is really phenomenal, she deserves an Oscar just based on the back of her "I Dreamed A Dream" performance alone. She had pretty short screentime though.

Hugh Jackman is good and I really think he played his role very well. His singing was pretty good too.

Russell Crowe can't sing tbh, so his singing was probably the most cringe-worthy part of the movie. Lucky he didn't have many solos so it's still tolerable. His acting was good though.

Eddie Redmayne I think is my fave male actor, he's so good + his singing was decent as well. He should be nominated for Best Supporting Actor I think.

Samantha Barks was brilliant. Her performance of "On My Own" is my second-fave from the movie after "I Dreamed A Dream".

It's a really touching movie in general and is one of my movies of the year. The whole movie is SUNG though, with practically no talking scenes.

4.5/5.
"To love another person is to see the face of God." - Les Misérables
User avatar
Tripolis
Manager
 
Posts: 2646
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011

Postby jpguy » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:31 pm

GetBack wrote:I can't wait to see this! :D :D
::: ::: C H R I S T I N A * A G U I L E R A ::: The Voice of a Generation ::: :::
User avatar
jpguy
Legend
 
Posts: 17972
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007
Location: Max's Closet

Postby LotsOfLove » Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:58 pm

I can't wait to see this too.
I saw the trailer, and I really don't know the exact plot but the trailer was soo... captivating! I must watch this.
User avatar
LotsOfLove
Manager
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011

Postby Blondini » Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:11 pm

Les Misérables has recorded Universal’s biggest ever three-day opening in the UK at non-final $13.1m (£8.1m), which is also the biggest for producer Working Title and the biggest ever opening for a musical in the UK.

The people have sung. With a 37% market share, Tom Hooper’s adaptation of Les Misérables has debuted top of the UK box office with a record-breaking non-final $13.1m (£8.1m) debut.

That result marks Universal’s biggest ever three-day opening in the UK, topping the $11.5m (£7.1m) achieved by Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason, as well as being the biggest debut for producer Working Title. It is also the best-ever opening for a musical in the UK, toppling Mamma Mia! which took $10.6m (£6.6m) of which $9m (£5.6m) came from its Fri-Sun weekend.

It also marks the biggest opening for Hooper in the UK by some margin. The King’s Speech was his previous best at $5.7m (£3.5m), although it went on to enjoy a sterling run in the UK and grossed $73.8m (£45.7m).
I Love You, Richard Parker!
User avatar
Blondini
Big Time Dreamer
 
Posts: 42552
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005
Location: Stockton-on-Tees, UK

Postby Blondini » Wed Jan 16, 2013 7:07 pm

#1 UK album midweek. I Dreamed A Dream #21, On My Own #38. Neither of the two previous charting cast albums sold anything like this.
I Love You, Richard Parker!
User avatar
Blondini
Big Time Dreamer
 
Posts: 42552
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005
Location: Stockton-on-Tees, UK

Postby Spartan » Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:07 pm

Saw this a couple of days ago, I thought it was average. Too much singing (and I love musicals). Too much Russell Crowe, too lengthly.

I think my expectations for Hathaway and Jackman were too high because I thought both were very decent but not jaw-droppingly amazing like everyone made out.
"if that's a veiled criticism about me, I won't hear it and I won't respond to it"
User avatar
Spartan
Legend
 
Posts: 20107
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009

Postby steophonic » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:17 am

I really liked it - had to hold back the tears at the end.

I think the reviews have been mixed but I thought it was great. Anne Hathaway particularly impressed me. Hugh Jackson also exceeded my expectations.
User avatar
steophonic
Music Junkie
 
Posts: 21514
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004

Postby Loveguru » Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:21 am

:lol:


This movie is just NO :lol: So much singing.. amazing how Kat Deluna didn't get a gig in this since she loves singing songs noone cares about.

Anne however was amazing, like her aura was just wow coming from someone who hated this mess of a film
Let me show you a few things # shag me in my suit & tie
User avatar
Loveguru
Superstar
 
Posts: 8586
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009

Postby RaFanatic » Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:24 am

This movie is based on Victor Hugo's novel Les Miserables, right? That's my fave book! I loved that old version of this movie so i'm really excited to watch this one too!
Svaka moja slabost je sigurno prolazna/Ne mrzi ljude, treba ljubav da im das.
User avatar
RaFanatic
Legend
 
Posts: 18477
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009
Location: Earth

Postby Merci » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:19 pm

^ yes

I read the book in 2001
User avatar
Merci
Legend
 
Posts: 14078
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006
Location: Kuwait

Postby crazyman324 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:38 pm

I was in the musical years ago at school, I have loved it since and seen it many times on stage. This was a fantastic film. It was very well done and I loved it.

It's "Les Miserables"... a 3 hour stage show, a musical that is sung all the way through. It was done complete justice I felt. If it was anything less it would have been a watered down imitation. As it goes, they did shorten a lot of numbers and even cut some out.

And as for people who think that the film is in any way flawed because they sing a lot or that it's quite long, just highlights they don't really know what they're talking about. It's a bit like listening to John Cage's 3'44 and complaining afterwards that it didn't have a beat drop.

Opinions are of course entitled. Didn't enjoy it? Fine. But I do find it insulting to call it a "mess" of a film, and say stupid things like "songs no one cares about".
User avatar
crazyman324
The Ringleader
 
Posts: 16119
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004
Location: Your mum.

Postby Brad » Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:06 pm

crazyman324 wrote:And as for people who think that the film is in any way flawed because they sing a lot or that it's quite long, just highlights they don't really know what they're talking about. It's a bit like listening to John Cage's 3'44 and complaining afterwards that it didn't have a beat drop.

Opinions are of course entitled. Didn't enjoy it? Fine. But I do find it insulting to call it a "mess" of a film, and say stupid things like "songs no one cares about".
YES. Someone finally said it.
User avatar
Brad
Superstar
 
Posts: 7742
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010

Postby Spartan » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:04 pm

crazyman324 wrote:It's "Les Miserables"... a 3 hour stage show, a musical that is sung all the way through. It was done complete justice I felt. If it was anything less it would have been a watered down imitation. As it goes, they did shorten a lot of numbers and even cut some out.
That's my main point I LOVE the show. I feel like it's a completely different experience watching a stage show as there's a lot more presence whereas I just don't feel its transition into a feature length film worked, in my opinion. :)
"if that's a veiled criticism about me, I won't hear it and I won't respond to it"
User avatar
Spartan
Legend
 
Posts: 20107
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009

Postby crazyman324 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:51 pm

You seem to be suggesting that the film would have had better "presence" if it was shorter?

Obviously in a theatre, the dynamics are different, primarily because of the audience's proximity to the actors, the theatre itself and the sound of a live band. Emotional engagement is perhaps better-achieved. Plus with the set, as fantastic as they can make it with the revolving stage, barricades, lighting and sound effects, you have to rely on imagination at time, so it could be considered a more "personal" experience.

However, even that considered, it's such a huge musical in terms of narrative, as well as the setting and costume. They had the resources to bring it all "to life" as such. And the live singing - particularly with Anne Hathaway, Samantha Barkes and Hugh Jackman - made it as close to that raw stage-show-emotion as a film adaptation could be.



I'm not damning your opinion, merely querying as someone who also loves the show, how could they have made the film better? (*cough* Russel Crowe aside)
User avatar
crazyman324
The Ringleader
 
Posts: 16119
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004
Location: Your mum.

Postby steophonic » Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:43 pm

If anything it was too short... It was a shame to see some of the scenes/songs cut out of it!

But on balance it was really well done. I'm looking forward to watching it on DVD! It was also nice to see Colm Wilkinson have a role!
User avatar
steophonic
Music Junkie
 
Posts: 21514
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004

Return to TV & Film