Introduction To The Record Mirror Singles Chart 1954 - 1961 - Revised Calculated And Extended
Some of you may remember I posted a project similar to above a few years back.
However, useful as it was at the time it was very limited in its scope. It was very basic in concept using just a notebook and calculator, it used the Inverse Points system, it was only 20 to 30 places deep, and only covered the period of August 1954 until October 1955.
It was always my goal to improve on this but it was put on hold because of the Covid pandemic and my inability to travel to London to obtain the dealer charts printed in Record Mirror housed within The British Library. So I worked on and posted The UAC instead.
I was able at the beginning of August to finally get to London and after many, many hours of research at The British Library I now have copies all of the available Dealer Return Charts published in Record Mirror from June 1954 until Record Mirror stopped compiling their own chart in March 1962 and took the RR chart. Over 1,500 part pages of chart data.
During this exercise I was also able to copy all Record Mirror's Album Charts too from 1956 until March 1962.
Background
I can say from the outset you will see differences between this new Record Mirror chart and that published weekly by Record Mirror themselves from January 1955 (See Methodology below). Back in the day Record Mirror like most other music papers of the time saw their chart as more a novelty feature as opposed to the serious reporting on the music business.
Chart compilation would almost certainly be time limited as deadlines had to be met and bearing in mind the chart was a novelty. It was doubtless good for the time but almost certainly not a totally robust chart. The amount of dealer returns varied week to week but one interesting article I saw in the paper stated that ' dealer charts received were rotated every week' for use in compiling the Record Mirror chart'. I have to state nothing was ever stated in the paper at any time as to how many dealer charts were used on a weekly basis.
Methodology
This time I am not using Inverse Points but am using Gallup Average Sales Data which more accurately determines the average
relationship in sales between chart positions for compiling the chart. ( see further on for more data on this).
Each weekly chart will contain every record that appears on a dealer chart for that week.
This will be a record chart this time around, no split sides where both sides appear on the chart, as these will be combined under the one record heading. The Gallup system allows for both sets of points to be added together to give a joint position.
The Gallup system is also much better at breaking ties due to using decimal points and although these are many in the lower half of the
chart this is because the records concerned are each only on one chart at the same position.
The chart will contain Albums and EP's, coloured in Red and Blue respectively for ease of identification.
All Dealer Charts published are used for chart compilation and these do fluctuate from week to week. The only exception to this is that
'specialist jazz charts' are not included but will be only if the that chart contains 'pop' records also.
Given the lengthy compilation time these charts will need, posting will be probably be twice weekly where there are lots of dealer returns.
The chart will be accurately compiled using the above methodology to deliver what I believe to be a credible robust chart much, much bigger than any other chart of the times.
Last and Not Least
I must thank those named below who enthusiastically offered to help with this formidable project from the outset by bringing their own specialist knowledge and time to the table to create this credible reliable chart.
So, Robin, Lonnie, David and Kjell must get credit too for this project seeing the light of day. Without their valuable assistance, input, and specialist knowledge we would not have the robust chart methodology and spreadsheet that are central to drive this project forward.
We did not reach these decisions lightly. We spent weeks looking at best methodology for compilation, Inverse Points, Chartwatch Points Related sales System, BARS BMRB information etc etc. We compiled trial charts evaluating each outcome to see what produced the best result time and time again and then finally decided The Gallup Average Sales Data method produced the best result. This used Gallup Sales data over a 51 week period looking at the differentials in sales patterns between each chart position to give a good sound workable average. We debated on how to manage ties, split positions, and came to a satisfactory conclusion we all agreed on.
I believe the results will speak for themselves.
Enjoy a new alternative but equally accurate and more robust Record Mirror chart, and be amazed at the artists and songs appearing on the chart for the first time, losing the status of being 'one hit wonders', and adding more hits to their roster previously uncredited.
Some of you may remember I posted a project similar to above a few years back.
However, useful as it was at the time it was very limited in its scope. It was very basic in concept using just a notebook and calculator, it used the Inverse Points system, it was only 20 to 30 places deep, and only covered the period of August 1954 until October 1955.
It was always my goal to improve on this but it was put on hold because of the Covid pandemic and my inability to travel to London to obtain the dealer charts printed in Record Mirror housed within The British Library. So I worked on and posted The UAC instead.
I was able at the beginning of August to finally get to London and after many, many hours of research at The British Library I now have copies all of the available Dealer Return Charts published in Record Mirror from June 1954 until Record Mirror stopped compiling their own chart in March 1962 and took the RR chart. Over 1,500 part pages of chart data.
During this exercise I was also able to copy all Record Mirror's Album Charts too from 1956 until March 1962.
Background
I can say from the outset you will see differences between this new Record Mirror chart and that published weekly by Record Mirror themselves from January 1955 (See Methodology below). Back in the day Record Mirror like most other music papers of the time saw their chart as more a novelty feature as opposed to the serious reporting on the music business.
Chart compilation would almost certainly be time limited as deadlines had to be met and bearing in mind the chart was a novelty. It was doubtless good for the time but almost certainly not a totally robust chart. The amount of dealer returns varied week to week but one interesting article I saw in the paper stated that ' dealer charts received were rotated every week' for use in compiling the Record Mirror chart'. I have to state nothing was ever stated in the paper at any time as to how many dealer charts were used on a weekly basis.
Methodology
This time I am not using Inverse Points but am using Gallup Average Sales Data which more accurately determines the average
relationship in sales between chart positions for compiling the chart. ( see further on for more data on this).
Each weekly chart will contain every record that appears on a dealer chart for that week.
This will be a record chart this time around, no split sides where both sides appear on the chart, as these will be combined under the one record heading. The Gallup system allows for both sets of points to be added together to give a joint position.
The Gallup system is also much better at breaking ties due to using decimal points and although these are many in the lower half of the
chart this is because the records concerned are each only on one chart at the same position.
The chart will contain Albums and EP's, coloured in Red and Blue respectively for ease of identification.
All Dealer Charts published are used for chart compilation and these do fluctuate from week to week. The only exception to this is that
'specialist jazz charts' are not included but will be only if the that chart contains 'pop' records also.
Given the lengthy compilation time these charts will need, posting will be probably be twice weekly where there are lots of dealer returns.
The chart will be accurately compiled using the above methodology to deliver what I believe to be a credible robust chart much, much bigger than any other chart of the times.
Last and Not Least
I must thank those named below who enthusiastically offered to help with this formidable project from the outset by bringing their own specialist knowledge and time to the table to create this credible reliable chart.
So, Robin, Lonnie, David and Kjell must get credit too for this project seeing the light of day. Without their valuable assistance, input, and specialist knowledge we would not have the robust chart methodology and spreadsheet that are central to drive this project forward.
We did not reach these decisions lightly. We spent weeks looking at best methodology for compilation, Inverse Points, Chartwatch Points Related sales System, BARS BMRB information etc etc. We compiled trial charts evaluating each outcome to see what produced the best result time and time again and then finally decided The Gallup Average Sales Data method produced the best result. This used Gallup Sales data over a 51 week period looking at the differentials in sales patterns between each chart position to give a good sound workable average. We debated on how to manage ties, split positions, and came to a satisfactory conclusion we all agreed on.
I believe the results will speak for themselves.
Enjoy a new alternative but equally accurate and more robust Record Mirror chart, and be amazed at the artists and songs appearing on the chart for the first time, losing the status of being 'one hit wonders', and adding more hits to their roster previously uncredited.
Comment