Randomly thinking about this.
I would consider my self risk-averse - however, earlier I then just remembered that in my last job, I was so frustrated with it that I handed my notice in without having had a new job lined up (which I'm told is quite a risky thing to do ) - thankfully, after some persuasion my boss talked me round. But generally speaking, I am a planner - I like methodology, I like structure and my brain works really logically so I feel as though generally speaking, I am a risk averse person. Anyway, I did this random risk test online and it fits my attitude to risk perfectly:
Takes about 10 mins to do if interested: https://testyourself.psychtests.com/testid/212241/100
Sensation-seekers thrive on new, intense, and varied situations. Their personalities are associated with risk-taking because sensation-seeking drives individuals to seek out highly stimulating experiences, which often include risk. Sensation-seekers have strong positive reactions to intense stimuli. While there are many constructive aspects of this personality type, those with this trait often take more risks, are more impulsive, and become bored more easily. In certain ways, a sensation-seeking personality is an asset - such individuals thrive on stress, action, uncertainty, and challenge. In other ways, it is a liability - they may take outlandish risks. Low sensation-seekers, on the other hand, are reliable, can handle monotony, and prefer to sleep on their decisions. They avoid novel and stimulating experiences.
You scored in the mid-range in sensation-seeking. You need a moderate level of excitement and stimulation - not too little, not too much. You could probably handle both new situations and monotony, although neither extreme is ideal for you. Your moderate need for stimulation makes you a versatile employee.
What about y'all? What's the riskiest things y'all have done?