Erm, okay. YES SIR!! *salutes*Lynx wrote:Muzikritik,
Are you a 12-year old boy? The movie sucks BIG TIME, apart from lovely soundtrack by Pink. You will waste your money and time
The House WtF? you mean The Hours, cos that movie is amazing and Charlies Angels is nothing compared to..Muzikritik wrote:Critics suck. They like movies like 'American Beauty' and 'The House'. Charlie's Angels is just an action-packed fast-paced fun film wit plenty of fiiiiine women to stare at.
eh, it's just boring . . . I wouldn't waste $$ on it. A home movie for boys n girls. What's new pussy cats whoa whoa whoa...Jami wrote:Erm, okay. YES SIR!! *salutes*
I saw it tonight and thought it was good, like I expected just a fun movie. Just like the first one.
Eh, you sound patronising. I don't like that.Lynx wrote:eh, it's just boring . . . I wouldn't waste $$ on it. A home movie for boys n girls. What's new pussy cats whoa whoa whoa...
Went to see it yesterday! Woooooo! Boring? Hell no! I haven't had so much fun sitting on my arse for 2 hours in ages than when I was watching Lucy, Drew and Cameron kick some bad-guy-ass! I didn't waste any money on CA2:FT because it gave me what I wanted - and more, and it's so much better to see on a big screen than what I imagine it'd look like on a small screen.Lynx wrote:eh, it's just boring . . . I wouldn't waste $$ on it. A home movie for boys n girls. What's new pussy cats whoa whoa whoa...
Well, no I dont think they get there fair share. Obviously for one of the reasons being money. How can they justify giving Cameron Diaz more than Lucy or Drew? They are all key roles in the movie!Muzikritik wrote:Do you think each Angel got their fair share?
One word: HELL NO! Ok that was 2Muzikritik wrote:OK, a question I wanted to pose to you guys. Do you think each Angel got their fair share? Much has been made of the fact that each girl got a signficiantly different pay cheque.
For Charlie's Angels, the salaries were:
Cameron Diaz- 12 million
Drew Barrymore- 9 million (plus a % of gross, for producing)
Lucy Liu- 1 million
... and for Charlie's Angels Full Throttle, they got:
Cameron Diaz- 20 million
Drew Barrymore- 14 million
Lucy Liu- 4 million
and Demi Moore also got 2 million.
Is it fair?
Are you Kidding? Drew has done 41* Films, Lucy has done 15* films and Cameron has done 24 (And not had a hit in years? Gangs Of New York? The Sweetest Thing? , Shrek?, Vanilla Sky?)Tiger wrote:One word: HELL NO! Ok that was 2
But my point being Lucy got soooooooo little, I mean IMO she's much better than Drew and prob just a *bit* less famous! Not 10 million less famous!
And I think Drew deserves more than Cameron personally as well, Cameron hasn't had a hit in years