Kim K Robbed At Gunpoint in Paris

Moderators: biscuits, Benjamin

 

Postby ShayLaB » Mon Oct 03, 2016 7:12 pm

Anybody that goes on holiday with $8,000,000 of jewellery and thinking this would not happen sooner rather than later is being spectacularly naive.
User avatar
ShayLaB
Manager
 
Posts: 4230
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008
Location: Star Command

Postby Goldmoney » Mon Oct 03, 2016 7:16 pm

I don't like her but I wouldn't wish this sort of evil on anybody.
User avatar
Goldmoney
Legend
 
Posts: 19757
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009
Location: Ratchet Street

Postby SS95 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 7:21 pm

Some people should realize that the jewelry worth of $8 million were not 100.000 ratchet earrings from Walmart that she carries around everywhere. It was probably just 2 very expensive earrings and a bracelet or something. So I don't understand why people say: Why would she carry the jewelry around
User avatar
SS95
Roadie
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016
Location: Netherlands

Postby ECE » Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:16 pm

Thank God I don't own $8m jewellery otherwise I'd be shit scared to be alive. Phew
User avatar
ECE
Superstar
 
Posts: 7336
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011

Postby greek_boy » Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:55 pm

SpyVsSpy wrote:
Mikerocha wrote:
Ska8er wrote:
MusicRecords wrote:Apparently it was more of an apartment/residence where other famous people like Madonna and Leo Di have stayed...the media says she's shocked but luckily she was not injured or anything, but they did take millions from her :o
How would they take millions from her? How big is her wallet?
She's at Paris Fashion Week. The millions are the worth of her jewelry. She had apparently jewelry in her room worth up to 8 million dollars.
She keeps 8m worth of jewelry in her room, unsecured and unguarded?
this!

unless her bodyguards are the ones who robbed her...
User avatar
greek_boy
Legend
 
Posts: 30459
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006

Postby Nippian93 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:09 pm

Kim Kardashian's Paris robbery is too good to be true

Yeah, right.

There's a reason why half the world doesn't believe that armed gunmen stormed into Kim Kardashian's super-secure Paris lair on Sunday night and made off with $10 million in jewels.

Because it's too good to be true.

Here's what we know: Kim Kardashian claims that five masked men stormed into her room, tied her up at gunpoint, threatened to kill her before she begged for her life, and then stole more than $10 million in jewels before fleeing on bikes. She then somehow broke free of her bondage and called her husband Kanye West, possibly while he was onstage at a concert in Queens, prompting him to abruptly cancel the remainder of the show. He returned to Manhattan to wait out the storm.

Wow! It's a made for TV story. And won't it be amazing when it airs when "Keeping up with the Kardashians" returns (wouldn't you know) on Oct. 23!

But here's the problem: when it comes to the Kardashians, the media simply can't keep up. Indeed, our normal skepticism and usual methods for checking basic facts disappear.

The entire story so far is based on an unnamed Kardashian "rep" and paraphrased synopses from French authorities.

If this happened in New York, the police commissioner, the mayor and the Manhattan DA would have had three press conferences and surveillance shots of the alleged men would have already been transmitted to every phone in the country. And the city's papers would be rushing to beat each other with scoops.

Because something's not right. This doesn't feel like a heist. It feels like a plot twist for a season premiere. Why did West stop his concert mid-rap, citing a "family emergency," yet not rush to Paris to be with his distraught wife?

Why did Kim leave the City of Light mere hours after she was supposedly interviewed by Paris cops?

Where is the concierge who was accosted by the gunmen before giving them access to the Kardashian aerie? And who is he or she?
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainmen ... -1.2815747

:)
❤Whitney Houston
User avatar
Nippian93
Legend
 
Posts: 39857
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016

Postby Nippian93 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:13 pm

Image

Image

Image
❤Whitney Houston
User avatar
Nippian93
Legend
 
Posts: 39857
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016

Postby Mikerocha » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:17 pm

Okay this is now a joke.
“B**** come here! B**** come here! B**** come here!”

“I’m staying right here.”
User avatar
Mikerocha
Superstar
 
Posts: 9295
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008
Location: All over the place

Postby MrDiva » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:19 pm

I don't really care.

Sad if true
But happens all the time
I'm not giving her any attention
MrDiva
Legend
 
Posts: 10169
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013
Location: Germany

Postby ECE » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:54 pm

I say Kim for First Lady
User avatar
ECE
Superstar
 
Posts: 7336
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011

Postby menime123 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:56 pm

I know it's not the point, but at least she's insured. I see her bodyguard is getting a bad rap, but seriously, if there men pointing guns he couldn't have done anything.
Girls Aloud: only 4 years left of my decade long signature countdown to my dream 20th anniversary reunion tour...
User avatar
menime123
Legend
 
Posts: 14229
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005

Postby menime123 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:56 pm

ECE wrote:I say Kim for First Lady
2020 apparently :lol:
Girls Aloud: only 4 years left of my decade long signature countdown to my dream 20th anniversary reunion tour...
User avatar
menime123
Legend
 
Posts: 14229
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005

Postby Goosey » Tue Oct 04, 2016 1:06 am

menime123 wrote:I see her bodyguard is getting a bad rap, but seriously, if there men pointing guns he couldn't have done anything.
Image
But the baddest b---- in heels right there
User avatar
Goosey
Groupie
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016

Postby biscuits » Tue Oct 04, 2016 1:57 am

ECE wrote:I say Kim for First Lady
I agree
User avatar
biscuits
The Diva
 
Posts: 46952
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010

Postby Rihab » Tue Oct 04, 2016 2:14 am

First lady? I say Kim for president.
User avatar
Rihab
Legend
 
Posts: 18333
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010
Location: Germany

Postby jpguy » Tue Oct 04, 2016 3:46 am

Lol @ the coverage this got in the last 24 hours hahaha h
::: Christina Aguilera - Liberation IS COMING 6.15.18 :::
User avatar
jpguy
Legend
 
Posts: 24512
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007
Location: Xtina's Closet.

Postby Leesal » Tue Oct 04, 2016 9:23 am

I totally understand that Kim Kardashian isn't everybody's cup of tea, but I still think that in this particular situation human compassion should outweigh public dislike of her. Until there is evidence to the contrary, we should believe her in my opinion.
Leesal
Groupie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016

Postby Serby » Tue Oct 04, 2016 10:38 am

jpguy wrote:Lol @ the coverage this got in the last 24 hours hahaha h
Not muxh or a lot? It feels like former tbh, I see this just now and my fb is not really flooded luike I would expect it to be.

Not sure what to think, but if true, it's scary and bad, be it Kim or someone else! imho, I don't get people who like jewelry, like wtf is there about them to like so much that you want a 5 mili piece on your ring instead of some normal bling bling. I hated jewerly since I was a kid.
be kind to every kind
User avatar
Serby
Dr. Serby
 
Posts: 36752
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011
Location: Halliwell Manor

Postby SpyVsSpy » Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:02 pm

Strange there's not many details emerging by now... or did i miss anything?
User avatar
SpyVsSpy
Superstar
 
Posts: 6824
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008

Postby menime123 » Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:22 pm

SpyVsSpy wrote:Strange there's not many details emerging by now... or did i miss anything?
Well I hope this means the French police are dealing with it
Girls Aloud: only 4 years left of my decade long signature countdown to my dream 20th anniversary reunion tour...
User avatar
menime123
Legend
 
Posts: 14229
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005

Postby menime123 » Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:23 pm

Leesal wrote:I totally understand that Kim Kardashian isn't everybody's cup of tea, but I still think that in this particular situation human compassion should outweigh public dislike of her. Until there is evidence to the contrary, we should believe her in my opinion.
I'm no fan, but she's doing no one any harm. I wouldn't want anyone to be robbed for a few jewels. People should be able to own nice things without this happening.
Girls Aloud: only 4 years left of my decade long signature countdown to my dream 20th anniversary reunion tour...
User avatar
menime123
Legend
 
Posts: 14229
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005

Postby Spiral » Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:41 pm

If this is true, then poor her but I still don't understand how Kim and her family got famous? I mean is being famous without any talent is a talent by itself? :-? :lol: Im actually surprised people are obsessed with her and her family. (Well in America anyway, not other part of the world....at least not in Asia.....I think.... :lol: ). I watched their show few times on TV but I still don't understand how is it famous........
User avatar
Spiral
Manager
 
Posts: 3694
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005

Postby ThaInfo1 » Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:56 pm

Leesal wrote:I totally understand that Kim Kardashian isn't everybody's cup of tea, but I still think that in this particular situation human compassion should outweigh public dislike of her. Until there is evidence to the contrary, we should believe her in my opinion.
Well said!
BARDI GANG!!
User avatar
ThaInfo1
Legend
 
Posts: 22193
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006
Location: Wherever your fine daddy is at.

Postby hellohello » Tue Oct 04, 2016 2:21 pm

Spiral wrote:If this is true, then poor her but I still don't understand how Kim and her family got famous? I mean is being famous without any talent is a talent by itself? :-? :lol: Im actually surprised people are obsessed with her and her family. (Well in America anyway, not other part of the world....at least not in Asia.....I think.... :lol: ). I watched their show few times on TV but I still don't understand how is it famous........
Being famous and having talent are two completely different things. You don't need talent to be famous. It helps to be talented but nowadays having a sex appeal, commercialised brands such as endorsement deals are more important. Kim K has mass appeal and is just apart of a brand used for consumerism.
Madonna......Rihanna....Beyonce....Michael...Janet....Prince...Mariah...Whitney
User avatar
hellohello
Manager
 
Posts: 4728
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005
Location: Love On the Brain

Postby menime123 » Tue Oct 04, 2016 6:05 pm

hellohello wrote:
Spiral wrote:If this is true, then poor her but I still don't understand how Kim and her family got famous? I mean is being famous without any talent is a talent by itself? :-? :lol: Im actually surprised people are obsessed with her and her family. (Well in America anyway, not other part of the world....at least not in Asia.....I think.... :lol: ). I watched their show few times on TV but I still don't understand how is it famous........
Being famous and having talent are two completely different things. You don't need talent to be famous. It helps to be talented but nowadays having a sex appeal, commercialised brands such as endorsement deals are more important. Kim K has mass appeal and is just apart of a brand used for consumerism.
She's a reality star - she sells a version of herself for public consumption and the public buy it. You. You could argue that marketing yourself in such a way is a form of talent - with the money she has made, how could it not?

But I have no interest in her at all :lol:

Still, I don't wish this on anyone.
Girls Aloud: only 4 years left of my decade long signature countdown to my dream 20th anniversary reunion tour...
User avatar
menime123
Legend
 
Posts: 14229
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005

Return to Celebrity Gossip

cron