Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 35 of 35

Thread: Mass shooting in Ohio, US

  1. #26
    BehindBreakaway's Avatar
    Manager
    Join Date
    01 Nov 2016
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    3,944
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)

    by » Mon August 5th, 2019, 23:57

    Quote Originally Posted by Postgenic View Post
    Banning them isn't the solution; ffs alcohol was banned during Prohibition and yet many people still acquired it illegally, and many drugs like meth, heroin and cocaine are illegal at the moment and yet that also hasn't stopped people from obtaining them via nefarious ways. The only thing that banning guns would do is increase arms trafficking.



    What does religion have to do with any of this? There's nothing in the Bible that advocates for gun violence so I don't know what you're trying to imply.
    Yes but surely if the guns are harder to obtain, there's less chance of your average Joe crazy being able to get one. Guns aren't easy to just illegally obtain. There would 100% be less mass shootings if guns where banned. Its worked in other places around the world. Where I live it's seen as being paramilitary lead which leads people to think that you can get guns whenever. It doesn't work like that. Yes. Illegally gun trading may go up, but imo the pros far, far outweigh the cons.
    3 months and I'm still sober, picked all my weeds but kept the flowers!

  2. #27
    DnBLover's Avatar
    Legend
    Join Date
    21 Dec 2009
    Location
    PT-NO
    Posts
    15,214
    Mentioned
    62 Post(s)

    by » Tue August 6th, 2019, 00:08

    Quote Originally Posted by Postgenic View Post
    Banning them isn't the solution; ffs alcohol was banned during Prohibition and yet many people still acquired it illegally, and many drugs like meth, heroin and cocaine are illegal at the moment and yet that also hasn't stopped people from obtaining them via nefarious ways. The only thing that banning guns would do is increase arms trafficking.



    What does religion have to do with any of this? There's nothing in the Bible that advocates for gun violence so I don't know what you're trying to imply.
    I am the maniac, I am the ghoul
    I'm in the shadows in the corners of my room

  3. #28
    Serby's Avatar
    Legend
    Join Date
    19 Jan 2011
    Location
    Halliwell Manor
    Posts
    37,445
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)

    by » Tue August 6th, 2019, 02:45

    Well since you're one of the good religious people, do you call out those who abuse the religion? Or are you pretending they don't exist and gonna stick to the useless 'not in my church' rethoric?
    be kind to every kind (also the unkind kind!!!!! )

  4. #29
    BeeBoy's Avatar
    Manager
    Join Date
    26 Dec 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    4,815
    Mentioned
    123 Post(s)

    by » Tue August 6th, 2019, 09:25

    Quote Originally Posted by Postgenic View Post

    What does religion have to do with any of this? There's nothing in the Bible that advocates for gun violence so I don't know what you're trying to imply.
    Fanatics of any religion will always feel superior because their believe is the right one and the only way to lead a life. It has been that way since thousands of years so I don't understand why you can't connect the dots. There is also nothing in the bible that advocates for crusades. Religious scriptures will always be twisted and turned. The shooter in El Paso was racist and a huge Trump and KKK supporter, the same way the shooting was aimed at latin immigrants, another will be aimed at muslims e.g. like the one in New Zealand.

  5. #30
    beredy's Avatar
    Superstar
    Join Date
    09 Nov 2010
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    8,467
    Mentioned
    258 Post(s)

    by » Tue August 6th, 2019, 14:51

    Quote Originally Posted by Postgenic View Post
    Banning them isn't the solution; ffs alcohol was banned during Prohibition and yet many people still acquired it illegally, and many drugs like meth, heroin and cocaine are illegal at the moment and yet that also hasn't stopped people from obtaining them via nefarious ways. The only thing that banning guns would do is increase arms trafficking.



    What does religion have to do with any of this? There's nothing in the Bible that advocates for gun violence so I don't know what you're trying to imply.
    LOL, yeah, because it's completely normal thinking that getting into a supermarket and putting a gun in your shopping basket next to butter and flour Guns should be nearly impossible to get to for citizens. Period.

    Also as there weren't any guns when Bible was written, it's impossible to find gun related violence. But write down every type and kind of violence from back then and you'll be able to put a check mark next to each and every, because you'll find them all in the Bible. Usually when god kills infidels. So I have no doubt that that very same god wouldn't pull a shooting range as one of his punishments.
    I have received many gifts from God,
    but this is the first time I have ever received a gift from a goddess
    .

    Don McLean on Madonna's version of American Pie

  6. #31
    Wayne's Avatar
    Legend
    Join Date
    07 Sep 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    55,344
    Mentioned
    377 Post(s)

    by » Tue August 6th, 2019, 21:49

    Quote Originally Posted by Postgenic View Post
    Banning them isn't the solution; ffs alcohol was banned during Prohibition and yet many people still acquired it illegally, and many drugs like meth, heroin and cocaine are illegal at the moment and yet that also hasn't stopped people from obtaining them via nefarious ways. The only thing that banning guns would do is increase arms trafficking.
    If banning them isn't the solution, then why do countries with tough gun laws not have this issue? Much stricter gun control is the start of the process, but there's a much more substantial cultural change that needs to happen - in the US, you are basically born in the belief that you are entitled to a gun because the constitution tells you you can have one. It is obscene.

  7. #32
    WEBofDESIRE's Avatar
    Personal Assistant
    Join Date
    06 Oct 2018
    Posts
    1,346
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)

    by » Wed August 7th, 2019, 14:01

    Quote Originally Posted by Postgenic View Post
    Banning them isn't the solution; ffs alcohol was banned during Prohibition and yet many people still acquired it illegally, and many drugs like meth, heroin and cocaine are illegal at the moment and yet that also hasn't stopped people from obtaining them via nefarious ways. The only thing that banning guns would do is increase arms trafficking.
    Not the old fashioned call to anarchy in response to reasonable gun law reform, that's so played out. You do realize that this same logic could be applied to all laws. LOL

    I assume your next argument is that you need a personal arsenal to protect against tyranny.

  8. #33
    Affillate's Avatar
    Superstar
    Join Date
    03 Nov 2013
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    5,528
    Mentioned
    138 Post(s)

    by » Sun August 11th, 2019, 06:30

    Quote Originally Posted by BehindBreakaway View Post
    Yes but surely if the guns are harder to obtain, there's less chance of your average Joe crazy being able to get one. Guns aren't easy to just illegally obtain. There would 100% be less mass shootings if guns where banned. Its worked in other places around the world. Where I live it's seen as being paramilitary lead which leads people to think that you can get guns whenever. It doesn't work like that. Yes. Illegally gun trading may go up, but imo the pros far, far outweigh the cons.
    This. Everyone always brings up Australia's response to the 1996 Port Arthur Massacre with the law changes and Gun amnesty as this paragon example of shutting down gun violence.

    That's not to say we now NEVER have any instances of gun crime (Eg every now and again you'll hear reports of a gang related drive by shooting, and we had some shocking things like the 2014 Lindt Cafe Siege and I recall there was a instance of a student shooting a police officer dead or something a couple years ago) but thankfully it hasn't reached the senseless number of lives lost as a direct result of gun violence again (IIRC 35 were killed at Port Arthur).

    That and probably helped by the fact guns aren't as easily obtainable or without the overall mindset of the 2nd amendment/'If the victims had a gun' mentality that's so rife in the US, that has made the situation just so out of hand.
    Last edited by Affillate; Sun August 11th, 2019 at 06:35.

  9. #34
    IVyoncé's Avatar
    Legend
    Join Date
    18 May 2009
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    26,189
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)

    by » Sun August 11th, 2019, 10:37

    Quote Originally Posted by Postgenic View Post
    Banning them isn't the solution; ffs alcohol was banned during Prohibition and yet many people still acquired it illegally, and many drugs like meth, heroin and cocaine are illegal at the moment and yet that also hasn't stopped people from obtaining them via nefarious ways. The only thing that banning guns would do is increase arms trafficking.
    The only reason why arms trafficking would increase in theory is because of the dumb reasoning that having a gun should be a 'right', the whole mindset is effed up to the core. I bet the police would knock you down in the US if you walk into a random supermarket with a massive knive or sword, yet you can get your cornflakes alongside a gun. No citizen should have acces to a gun, semi or automatic weapon, only trained professionals. Also the whole 'I need to protect myself' rhetoric is ridiculous, because in the end that would mean that if everyone has an atomic bomb in their backyard, you also need to get one to 'protect' your home, while all you do is destroy the world if you all push that button. I know the last is a ridiculous example, but it is the kind of logic that is getting used by a lot of people. Same for the dumb excuse that people need a semi-automatic weapon to 'hunt', while if you would hunt a deer with that kind of weapon, there would be nothing left but small pieces.

    The mindset needs to change, the guns need to be banned and anyone who eventually gets acces to a gun needs to be screened and checked plenty of times a year. People can mentally change in a couple of months because of tragic events etc. It will not completely prevent these kind of things happening but it would fore sure decrease the numbers A LOT.

  10. #35
    LittleLinda's Avatar
    Manager
    Join Date
    25 Sep 2008
    Location
    Bavarian Exile, Germany
    Posts
    4,251
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)

    by » Sun August 11th, 2019, 12:54

    A request to anyone opposing stricter gun laws:
    1) Please stop saying that it won’t prevent mass shootings, because there are ways to illegally obtain guns. Stopping mass shootings from happening is impossible, nobody is claiming otherwise. The attempt is to drastically reduce them, because the numbers in the US are beyond ridiculous at this point. Stricter gun laws are a viable way to this. If you think otherwise you obviously also think traffic signs are redundant, because some people frequently ignore them, banks don’t need alarm systems because robberies still happen and fences aren’t needed because they can be climbed or torn down.
    The more difficult something is, the more risk, planning and effort it takes to actually pull it off, the less people do it. That is a simple fact. But as long as an everyday person can buy semi-automatic rifles (which were developed for one single purpose, can you guess which one that is?) mass shootings will remain an everyday problem.

    2) Please give me a list of examples where a mass shooting was stopped in its tracks by „a good guy with a gun“ (not counting police officers who were called to the scene) I‘m honestly curious how many times that worked, as it is such a frequently used argument by the NRA and its fans.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •